Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Pavilion dv8000 (EP454UA#ABL) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 309B
Memory	0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20060224
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 30 '19 at 14:10
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Turion 64 Mobile Technology ML-37 17 User benchmarks, average bench 35% U23, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	29% Poor	Memory 54.4 1-Core 24.8 2-Core 24.8 26% 34.7 Pts	4-Core 24.5 8-Core 24.4 3% 24.5 Pts	64-Core 24.8 2% 24.8 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI MOBILITY RADEON XPRESS 200 HP(103C 309B) Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.31.100.32 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0.19 0% 0.15 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HM160HC 160GB-$78 157 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: LQ100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 11 7.2 6 14 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	14.5% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 41.9 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 13.2 22% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 100% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.5% Great: 34%
Samsung HM160HC 160GB-$78 157 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 4GB free Firmware: LQ100-10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 13 10 9.2 16 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 26.2 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 15 18% 24.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 80% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DRAM Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	6.37% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 1.6 MC Mixed 1.5 5% 1.7 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 0.7 3% 1 GB/s	Latency 145 28% 145 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.37% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16