Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics60.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 27 '19 at 18:08
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
78% 136 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 369
47% 356 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.1% Good
Lighting 74.9
Reflection 78.5
Parallax 73.4
61% 75.6 fps
MRender 67
Gravity 71.8
Splatting 73.4
58% 70.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 211 209 204 195 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 462
Mixed 378
SusWrite 229
88% 390 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 57
192% 67.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 363
273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
73GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 140 144 144 145 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 101
Write 72.5
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 142
70% 94.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 112%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
7GB free, PID 003a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 12 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
Read 18.5
Write 19.5
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 17.6
25% 18.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.8
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 3.8
267% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 18%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
3GB free, PID 003a
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 18.2
Write 18.5
Mixed 17.5
23% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 3
228% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Vulcan 1600 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
55.6% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 19.9
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 16.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback