Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics77.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMar 17 '19 at 01:40
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 132
2-Core 258
84% 154 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 709
71% 576 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.8% Very good
Lighting 99.4
Reflection 91.1
Parallax 84.4
81% 91.6 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 87.9
Splatting 75.9
72% 89.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 817 1084 1107 1125 1128 1127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1098
Write 1,003
Mixed 640
SusWrite 1,065
214% 951 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 57.7
200% 73.5 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 1,049
DQ Mixed 616
527% 756 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 208%
Great: 353%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193
162GB free
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 182 194 148 175 174 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 412
Write 279
Mixed 298
SusWrite 178
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 39.4
159% 61 MB/s
DQ Read 33.3
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 127
103% 137 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 84%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35
69GB free
Firmware: 505CUA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 224 193 181 201 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 414
Write 271
Mixed 278
SusWrite 204
65% 292 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 37.2
161% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 187
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 44.3
81% 158 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 85%
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152
101GB free
Firmware: SAFM12.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 323 207 281 286 281 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 478
Mixed 351
SusWrite 295
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 40.7
153% 57.5 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 161
157% 247 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 99%
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60
73GB free
Firmware: 0117
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 41.2
Write 41.2
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 14.3
8% 34.2 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 11.6
40% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 22
DQ Mixed 11.4
11% 17.3 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 45%
ASMedia AS2115 1.5TB
304GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 68 68 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 81.8
Write 82.8
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 67.3
100% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 44%
JetFlash Transcend 4GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 5 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Read 20.5
Write 6.3
Mixed 6
SusWrite 4.7
10% 9.38 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 8GB
3GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 11 11 11 11 12 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 24
Write 13
Mixed 9.8
SusWrite 10.6
17% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.4
162% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 13%
SAMSUNG HD250HJ 250GB
103GB free, PID fcda
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 40.5
Mixed 35
SusWrite 13.4
42% 31.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$46
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.6% Good
MC Read 27.4
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 20.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 22
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,091 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $1,202
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback