PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Compaq 6005 Pro MT PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 3047h |
Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100804 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 17 '19 at 20:54 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
58%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 399.24
|
31.7%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$20
384GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 85 100 102 106 108 MB/s
|
57%
Above average
|
|||
Intenso External USB 3.0 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 711f
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 25 25 25 25 MB/s
|
14.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
31%
Below average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X4 B95AMDBench 53%, 2,408 samples | 26x |
Athlon II X2 B24AMDBench 42%, 2,045 samples | 22x |
Athlon II X2 B28AMDBench 45%, 816 samples | 13x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples | 44x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 10x |
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $28 |