Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5667 365 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	61.1% Good	Memory 66.4 1-Core 77.5 2-Core 149 57% 97.6 Pts	4-Core 300 8-Core 614 54% 457 Pts	64-Core 647 40% 647 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4000 11,114 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Nvidia(10DE 097C) 3GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 1404 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 411.95 Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Lighting 14.8 Reflection 13.9 Parallax 18.5 12% 15.7 fps	MRender 21.1 Gravity 18.4 Splatting 16.8 15% 18.8 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 13%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35 80,916 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 88 60 59 55 57 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.8% Below average	Read 185 Write 183 Mixed 89 SusWrite 81.6 30% 135 MB/s	4K Read 9.8 4K Write 18.2 4K Mixed 11.6 39% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 134 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 80.8 77% 120 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 82%
Hitachi HDE721010SLA330 1TB-$84 9,234 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 662GB free Firmware: ST6OA38G SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 86 87 86 87 87 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	49.6% Average	Read 86.2 Write 90.2 Mixed 50.8 SusWrite 86.3 58% 78.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 63%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 9GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.5 7.2 7 7.2 7.5 7.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.28% Terrible	Read 21.5 Write 6 Mixed 10 SusWrite 7.1 13% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.28% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70BH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70BH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70BH1-CH9 58GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	24.9% Poor	MC Read 8.2 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 7.5 23% 8.07 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 7.9 24% 8.43 GB/s	Latency 110 36% 110 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 64%, 7,756 samples	318x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56751stBench 68%, 4,275 samples	189x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56701stBench 67%, 4,676 samples	180x

SSD
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	34x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	34x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 261 samples	23x
ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PZ1G4F1 JE... 82GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	19x
ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT31GR7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 AD H... 130GBUnknownBench 53%, 67 samples	16x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $23	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16