Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	115% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X470-PRO (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	2.9 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '19 at 17:38
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	54%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	54.7% Above average	Memory 58.9 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 152 55% 96.8 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 472 45% 372 Pts	64-Core 696 43% 696 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.71 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.6% Above average	Lighting 62.3 Reflection 67.6 Parallax 62.1 51% 64 fps	MRender 63.4 Gravity 60.4 Splatting 61 50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$38 78,255 User benchmarks, average bench 179% 387GB free (System drive) Firmware: P3CR010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 472 449 411 401 426 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 713 Write 472 Mixed 451 SusWrite 437 116% 519 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 68.4 4K Mixed 38.9 136% 46.8 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 485 DQ Mixed 207 207% 326 MB/s
Poor: 103% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 242%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 608GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 90 88 89 88 89 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Read 87.5 Write 79.5 Mixed 56 SusWrite 88.1 57% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 67%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 27GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 67 62 62 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	35% Below average	Read 54.5 Write 28.2 Mixed 39.5 SusWrite 67 35% 47.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 62%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 80GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 4.3 4.7 5.5 4.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 669GB free Firmware: CC27 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 136 135 139 134 139 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	79% Very good	Read 139 Write 83.5 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 136 77% 105 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 114%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80 75,644 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 82GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 75 75 75 74 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	Read 114 Write 98.3 Mixed 52.7 SusWrite 73.8 62% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 96%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 11GB free Firmware: 0637 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 32 32 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 34.5 Write 30.2 Mixed 31.5 SusWrite 32.5 24% 32.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 111% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 66%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 154GB free, PID 2323 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 60 60 59 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	30.4% Below average	Read 50 Write 66.2 Mixed 56 SusWrite 59.2 81% 57.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.5 132% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 30.4% Great: 58%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 246GB free, PID 1006 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 25.5 Write 26.3 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 25.5 35% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FD 2x8GB 9,486 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 20.5 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 9.9 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 131 31% 131 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X470-PRO Builds (Compare 5,587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 81%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,955x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $185Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	437x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	405x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	288x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	288x
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	250x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	286x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	228x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	215x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	279x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	231x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	224x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $629

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X470-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X470-PRO - $139

Feedback

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)