HP 700-560jp

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	24% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP 700-560jp (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 2B36
Memory	9.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20150401
Uptime	4.2 Days
Run Date	Feb 01 '19 at 04:39
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348 455,746 User benchmarks, average bench 79% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 101 2-Core 210 74% 131 Pts	4-Core 349 8-Core 556 56% 452 Pts	64-Core 589 36% 589 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% HP(103C 2B49) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.35 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	24% Poor	Lighting 27.8 Reflection 32 Parallax 25.2 23% 28.4 fps	MRender 25.7 Gravity 44.7 Splatting 28.2 27% 32.9 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,949 Write 5,069 Mixed 5,316 1,214% 5,445 MB/s	4K Read 520 4K Write 291 4K Mixed 362 1,406% 391 MB/s	DQ Read 1049 DQ Write 777 DQ Mixed 695 579% 841 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$79 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 123 114 106 97 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 161 Write 133 Mixed 81 SusWrite 109 89% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 114%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 4 3.9 3.8 4.1 4.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	5.31% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 16 Mixed 17.3 SusWrite 5.1 19% 14.7 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.31% Great: 6%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 3.8 3.1 2.8 2.8 2.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	2.23% Terrible	Read 6.7 Write 6.5 Mixed 6 SusWrite 3.4 8% 5.65 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 8% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.23% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8C-PB Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 24GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	53.8% Above average	MC Read 19.3 MC Write 20.1 MC Mixed 16.1 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 16.9 48% 17 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 700-560jp Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: HP 700-560jp

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	1x

RAM
CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 0215 CMZ16GX3M4A1600C9 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GBUnknownBench 54%, 64 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $239

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP 700-560jp

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: HP 700-560jp

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)