Asus P8H67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 24 '19 at 17:56
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$189
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 167
70% 116 Pts
4-Core 292
8-Core 442
46% 367 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gainward(10B0 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1573 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 73.5
Parallax 71.2
57% 71.4 fps
MRender 75.3
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 58.6
54% 67 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 287 309 303 294 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 364
Write 310
Mixed 222
SusWrite 287
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 48.4
4K Mixed 25.1
92% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 29.6
DQ Write 98.5
DQ Mixed 35.2
35% 54.4 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$84
604GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 145 145 147 147 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 130
Write 99.8
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 144
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 114%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
1GB free, PID 1607
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.3 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
5.21% Terrible
Read 19
Write 2.5
Mixed 6
SusWrite 5.4
9% 8.23 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
20% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.21%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CML8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.8
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 16.5
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67 Builds (Compare 980 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67 - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $427
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback