Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus SABERTOOTH X79 (all builds)
Memory	6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140506
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jan 13 '19 at 14:00
Run Duration	217 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280 33,172 User benchmarks, average bench 74% LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Memory 86.9 1-Core 89.3 2-Core 160 67% 112 Pts	4-Core 278 8-Core 440 44% 359 Pts	64-Core 565 35% 565 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 3975) CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (47^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.1% Average	Lighting 61 Reflection 63 Parallax 55.1 50% 59.7 fps	MRender 63.9 Gravity 53.5 Splatting 50.5 45% 55.9 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston HyperX Predator AHCI PCIe M.2 240GB-$141 6,458 User benchmarks, average bench 131% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C4005T2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 883 Write 690 Mixed 406 146% 660 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 31 107% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 235 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 62.6 108% 207 MB/s
Poor: 84% Great: 159%
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 78GB free Firmware: 605ABBF2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 170 170 170 170 167 MB/s Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.7% Good	Read 261 Write 225 Mixed 240 SusWrite 172 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 62.4 4K Mixed 29.1 99% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 259 DQ Mixed 90.1 105% 178 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 84%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$22 83,084 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 132GB free Firmware: 0002BSM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 39 39 40 40 40 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	27.2% Poor	Read 55.5 Write 44 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 39.3 32% 42.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 43%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71 21,137 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 111GB free Firmware: PB4OC64G SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 51 50 54 50 52 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	34.2% Below average	Read 67.8 Write 42 Mixed 31.2 SusWrite 51.1 35% 48 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 45%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 29GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 105 111 99 102 86 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	54.8% Above average	Read 94 Write 87.8 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 96.7 66% 88.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 176% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 76%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 4GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 33 19 16 21 19 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 128 Write 55.5 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 29.2 85% 71.6 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.4 172% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 39%
Sony Storage Media 126GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 117GB free, PID 05b9 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	Read 27.3 Write 24.5 Mixed 25.2 SusWrite 24.9 34% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0 20% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 70%
ASMT 2105 500GB 584 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 39GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 74 77 74 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	30.5% Below average	Read 72.2 Write 58.3 Mixed 29 SusWrite 74.4 77% 58.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 171%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-006.A00LF 4x4GB 194 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	80.7% Excellent	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 32.2 MC Mixed 29.2 89% 31.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 11.5 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,777 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Speed boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

CPU
Core i7-3930KIntel $280Bench 74%, 33,172 samples	434x
Core i7-3820IntelBench 70%, 38,674 samples	383x
Core i7-4820KIntel $110Bench 72%, 23,169 samples	297x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	104x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	104x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	100x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	77x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	63x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	62x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	29x
Dominator DHX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 73%, 416 samples	21x
Vengeance DDR3 1866 4x8GBCorsairBench 88%, 441 samples	19x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $807

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16