Packard oneTwo L5351

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard oneTwo L5351  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard oneTwo L5351
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100517
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 10 '19 at 18:13
Run Duration377 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X2 220
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Memory 58.8
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 66.5
36% 55.2 Pts
4-Core 49.1
8-Core 51.3
7% 50.2 Pts
64-Core 9.7
1% 9.7 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9200
Acer(1025 0462) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
0.47% Terrible
Lighting 0.53
Reflection 1.08
Parallax 0.22
0% 0.61 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 0.74
1% 0.64 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.47%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
619GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 60 60 61 54 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 52.7
Write 9.8
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 61.3
27% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
94% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 59%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 1TB
131GB free, PID ab26
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 23 22 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 29.3
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 22.4
35% 25.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 52%
USB DISK 3.0 124GB
18GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 10 8.8 8.1 8.1 8.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
9.33% Terrible
Read 28.2
Write 18
Mixed 12
SusWrite 9.1
20% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.9
72% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.33%
Great: 41%
SAMSUNG HM080HC 80GB
8GB free, PID fcc7
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 8.8 3.8 7.8 4.6 7.8 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.08% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 13.1
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 6.5
15% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.08%
Great: 12%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLA302G08-EDJ1C Corsair CMV4GX3M1A1333C9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.1% Very poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 5.2
MC Mixed 5.3
18% 6.3 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 4.2
SC Mixed 0.5
10% 3.4 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical oneTwo L5351 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard oneTwo L5351

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $64
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback