Asus P5KPL-CM

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5KPL-CM (all builds)
Memory	2.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100827
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 06 '19 at 01:52
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	77%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E5200-$50 13,848 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Memory 74.4 1-Core 37.7 2-Core 79.3 42% 63.8 Pts	4-Core 81.2 8-Core 85 11% 83.1 Pts	64-Core 85.6 5% 85.6 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.17% Terrible	Lighting 1.37 Reflection 1.92 Parallax 1.62 1% 1.64 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.83 1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.17% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 65 72 72 72 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	43.4% Average	Read 144 Write 125 Mixed 151 SusWrite 70.8 28% 123 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 52.7 4K Mixed 28.4 99% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.8 DQ Write 89.4 DQ Mixed 34.2 33% 50.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 73%
WD WD200BB-00DGA0 20GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 19GB free Firmware: 16.06V16 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 35 34 35 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 45 Write 46.4 Mixed 23.2 SusWrite 34.4 27% 37.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 153% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 26%
Samsung SP1654N 160GB 267 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 149GB free Firmware: BV100-45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 34 35 35 35 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Read 57.2 Write 63.5 Mixed 39.4 SusWrite 34.4 36% 48.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 33%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 149GB free Firmware: JF100-19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 69 72 73 72 73 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 70.1 Write 75.3 Mixed 43.6 SusWrite 71.9 48% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 42%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 172 181 185 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Read 109 Write 147 Mixed 65.6 SusWrite 177 91% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.7 235% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 90%
Philips USB Flash Drive 16GB 344 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 11GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 15 16 14 16 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	9.21% Terrible	Read 24.2 Write 15.7 Mixed 10 SusWrite 15.1 20% 16.2 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.7 56% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 9.21% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 5 MC Mixed 5.3 17% 5.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.7 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 3.9 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 91.7 44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5KPL-CM Builds (Compare 104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-CM

CPU
Pentium E5200Intel $50Bench 36%, 13,848 samples	15x
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	11x
Pentium E5300Intel $59Bench 36%, 18,604 samples	6x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	10x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	9x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	4x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $49Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	5x
MX500 1TBCrucial $66Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	3x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	88x
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	9x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $99

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16