Asus M5A99X EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '18 at 16:47
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Memory 85.2
1-Core 51.8
2-Core 103
52% 80 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 290
28% 229 Pts
64-Core 309
19% 309 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
PNY(196E 104B) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1565 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.3% Average
Lighting 54.7
Reflection 48.8
Parallax 63.2
45% 55.6 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 62.9
Splatting 46.9
47% 58.8 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct240bx3 0 240GB
211GB free
Firmware: M2CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 254 311 318 327 323 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
87.4% Excellent
Read 486
Write 435
Mixed 432
SusWrite 303
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 39.3
129% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 197
150% 203 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 87.4%
Great: 114%
Samsung MZ7WD240HAFV-000 240GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 179 200 200 199 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 372
Write 289
Mixed 292
SusWrite 195
64% 287 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 28.7
98% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 183
137% 184 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 92%
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$180
223GB free
Firmware: LADi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 214 250 254 260 258 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 436
Write 274
Mixed 309
SusWrite 246
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 36
128% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 155
129% 186 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81%
Great: 89%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
119GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 259 315 322 331 326 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 371
Write 366
Mixed 278
SusWrite 308
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 34.5
122% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 207
156% 208 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 104%
Kingston HyperX 3K 120GB-$100
41GB free
Firmware: 580A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 167 146 148 141 163 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 410
Write 194
Mixed 274
SusWrite 158
58% 259 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 62.3
4K Mixed 39
130% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 210
160% 217 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1866, 1866 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 18
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 12
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO Builds (Compare 322 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $516
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback