HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	59.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP Z620 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 158A
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131118
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 14 '18 at 20:27
Run Duration	266 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 2,742 User benchmarks, average bench 60% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 57.5 2-Core 115 54% 85.4 Pts	4-Core 265 8-Core 371 40% 318 Pts	64-Core 499 31% 499 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Lighting 74.4 Reflection 74.8 Parallax 71.9 61% 73.7 fps	MRender 71.3 Gravity 68.7 Splatting 70.7 58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,933 Write 3,063 Mixed 2,953 668% 2983 MB/s	4K Read 169 4K Write 92.2 4K Mixed 85.7 415% 116 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 262 DQ Mixed 316 239% 323 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 446GB free Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 262 262 262 263 262 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	84% Excellent	Read 322 Write 248 Mixed 267 SusWrite 262 62% 275 MB/s	4K Read 33 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 40.4 128% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 410 286% 361 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 254%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$86 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 145 144 146 147 147 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Read 133 Write 128 Mixed 83.7 SusWrite 144 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 100%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 13,194 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 337GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 28.6 Write 27.6 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 13.3 18% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 103%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 125GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 25.3 Mixed 25 SusWrite 12.1 30% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 19%
WD 5000AAK External 500GB 332 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 208GB free, PID 1001 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 23.7 Write 26.7 Mixed 24.1 SusWrite 27.7 36% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 104% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 22%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1.5TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 12 11 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 29 Write 23 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 11.8 27% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 18JSF51272AZ-1G9K 4x4GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1867 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	92.1% Outstanding	MC Read 39.1 MC Write 34 MC Mixed 37.5 105% 36.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 9.9 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 74.2 54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,401 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	150x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	147x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	129x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	170x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	113x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	95x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 97%, 23 samples	20x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16