Lenovo 20192

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.58% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20192 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO INVALID
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121008
Uptime	20.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 12 '18 at 05:53
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3630QM-$420 65,927 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Memory 78.7 1-Core 88.4 2-Core 149 63% 105 Pts	4-Core 257 8-Core 421 41% 339 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 650M 12,732 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Legend(17AA 3972) 2GB CLim: 789 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.71 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.58% Terrible	Lighting 7.3 Reflection 6.77 Parallax 8.62 6% 7.56 fps	MRender 9.9 Gravity 8.83 Splatting 9.78 8% 9.51 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.58% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 407GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 408 304 163 157 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Read 456 Write 437 Mixed 376 SusWrite 263 86% 383 MB/s	4K Read 29.9 4K Write 53.7 4K Mixed 37.6 122% 40.4 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 268 228% 334 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 126%
Jmicron Tech 3TB 83 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 140GB free Firmware: 0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	9.67% Terrible	Read 23.2 Write 23.7 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 8.9 14% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 4.5 4K Mixed 0.7 186% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 9.67% Great: 119%
Jmicron Tech 4TB 113 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 3TB free Firmware: 0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.9 8.8 9.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9.69% Terrible	Read 24 Write 22 Mixed 22.8 SusWrite 9 15% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 9.69% Great: 104%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1TB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 37 36 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	17.7% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 33.2 Mixed 28 SusWrite 36.8 45% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 22%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB 2,189 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 9GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 24 27 26 26 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 23.5 Mixed 24.2 SusWrite 25.1 34% 25.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 22%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 520GB free, PID 1021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7 7.4 7.4 7.5 7.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	7.05% Terrible	Read 22.2 Write 20.8 Mixed 13.7 SusWrite 7.4 20% 16 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.3 35% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 7.05% Great: 44%
BUFFALO External HDD 3TB 185 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 49GB free, PID 01f1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.6 8.5 8.5 8.4 8.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.2% Very poor	Read 25 Write 23.5 Mixed 22.5 SusWrite 8.5 26% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11.2% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Mac SODIM DDR3 1066 C7 2x4GB 210 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	40.5% Average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 13 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 12.2 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 12 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 82.9 48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 20192 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20192

CPU
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	32x
Core i5-3230MIntel $100Bench 49%, 61,311 samples	3x
Core i7-3840QMIntel $549Bench 66%, 3,981 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 750MNvidiaBench 8%, 13,088 samples	18x
GeForce GT 650MNvidiaBench 6%, 12,732 samples	18x

SSD
Ultra 3D 1TBSanDisk $67Bench 98%, 5,838 samples	3x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
M5M mSATA 64GBPlextor $94Bench 64%, 128 samples	2x

RAM
RMT3160ED58E9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 53%, 6,794 samples	8x
M471B1G73BH0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 1,072 samples	2x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $487

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16