Acer ICONIA W3-810

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics0.48% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer ICONIA W3-810  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer CHEETAH
Memory1 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130913
Uptime25.6 Days
Run DateDec 22 '14 at 14:41
Run Duration214 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z2760
U2H1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 9.8
2-Core 19
7% 14.4 Pts
4-Core 33.9
8-Core 33.5
4% 33.7 Pts
64-Core 33.8
2% 33.8 Pts
Poor: 8% Great: 20%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator
Acer(1025 082F)
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.14.3.1177
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
0.48% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 0.42
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.61 fps
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MBG4GA 31GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0.6
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Read 78
Write 32
Mixed 30.9
35% 47 MB/s
4K Read 7.44
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 1.74
541% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 32%
Generic SD8GB SD Card 8GB
4GB free
Firmware: 3.0
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
7.27% Terrible
Read 15.6
Write 7.82
Mixed 10.6
8% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.18
4K Write 0.75
4K Mixed 0.84
323% 2.25 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.27%
Great: 13%
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback