Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics62.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150805
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 11 '18 at 11:05
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 133
58% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 400
38% 316 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 62%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2029 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.9% Good
Lighting 78.8
Reflection 77.9
Parallax 67.1
64% 74.6 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 74.6
60% 73.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
159GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 405 381 418 389 428 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 388
Write 426
Mixed 313
SusWrite 403
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 68.1
4K Mixed 32.4
113% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 210
164% 225 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 101%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
29GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 232 238 235 144 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 349
Write 269
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 191
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 23.5
76% 20.6 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 1
59% 145 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 92%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 1TB (2016)-$70
860GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 177 177 178 175 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 149
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 177
94% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 2
355% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 111%
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB
94GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 84 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
47.7% Average
Read 82.7
Write 41.9
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 83.3
49% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 58%
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB
113GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 103 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Read 103
Write 49.2
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 103
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown OCZ3P16002G F3-2400C10-4GTX OCZ3P16002G F3-2400C10-4GTX 12GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.9% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 13.2
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.9
28% 9.7 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback