Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime6.7 Days
Run DateSep 30 '18 at 12:33
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 87.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 231
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 435
60% 446 Pts
64-Core 445
28% 445 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1303 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.9.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Lighting 69.5
Reflection 66
Parallax 81.1
57% 72.2 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 65.9
Splatting 54.9
51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,007
Write 6,971
Mixed 7,162
1,646% 7,380 MB/s
4K Read 647
4K Write 307
4K Mixed 395
1,649% 450 MB/s
DQ Read 1,853
DQ Write 1,318
DQ Mixed 1,509
1,148% 1,560 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
9GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 466
Write 277
Mixed 311
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 53
185% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 228
202% 301 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 119 116 121 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 127
Write 119
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 119
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 859B BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBR2 859B BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 859B BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBR2 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 28.1
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H270-Gaming 3 Builds (Compare 1,317 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H270-Gaming 3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $383
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback