Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 16 '18 at 16:26
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 83
1-Core 42.6
2-Core 84.8
47% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 167
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Asus(1043 84BE) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 17
Parallax 20.5
19% 20.1 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 23.3
Splatting 17
18% 22 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 400i
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 368
Write 152
Mixed 205
53% 242 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 27.4
97% 33.1 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 154
125% 179 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 88%
OCZ AGILITY3 60GB
34GB free
Firmware: 2.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 49 51 53 53 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 140
Write 62
Mixed 81
SusWrite 51.6
18% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 24
88% 31.1 MB/s
DQ Read 74.8
DQ Write 57.8
DQ Mixed 65
49% 65.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
811GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 102 103 103 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Read 94.5
Write 96.2
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 102
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 74%
WD Elements 1TB
758GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 28 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
17% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 25.2
Mixed 24
SusWrite 27.7
36% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17%
Great: 43%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2322
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 132 134 131 132 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 103
Write 127
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 132
151% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.7
184% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 58%
WD 10EADS External 1TB
202GB free, PID 1003
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 36 36 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 31.5
Mixed 28
SusWrite 36.4
44% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
47.7% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 75.1
53% 75.1 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $989
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback