Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120803
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '18 at 21:24
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3550-$335
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
70% Good
Memory 84.7
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 186
70% 120 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 355
44% 334 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.2% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 66.7
Parallax 59.8
52% 63.4 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 60.8
Splatting 53.7
50% 61.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 128GB-$40
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 104 92 106 102 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
51.1% Above average
Read 262
Write 326
Mixed 211
SusWrite 98.7
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 61.3
4K Mixed 28.8
101% 36.9 MB/s
DQ Read 27.7
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 39.5
40% 62.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
637GB free
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 114 104 119 110 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Read 172
Write 190
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 109
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
173% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
438GB free, PID a00e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 85 84 85 84 85 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
39% Below average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 84.8
106% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB
277GB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 96 96 96 96 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
42% Average
Read 107
Write 101
Mixed 37
SusWrite 95.8
112% 85.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42%
Great: 44%
Freecom Portable USB 16GB
0GB free, PID fc1c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 11.7
Write 10.3
Mixed 11
14% 11 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
15% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SLZ302G08-GGNHC Kingston 99U5584-003.A00LF 06C1 SLA302G08-GGNHC Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.4% Average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 13.9
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $905
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback