Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	88.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 92.9 1-Core 110 2-Core 210 80% 138 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 599 62% 497 Pts	64-Core 592 37% 592 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GB 10,917 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV2100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 310 314 315 315 313 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Read 487 Write 456 Mixed 376 SusWrite 320 92% 410 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 45 150% 52.1 MB/s	DQ Read 35.2 DQ Write 84.3 DQ Mixed 46.4 39% 55.3 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 116%
Hgst HTS725050A7E630 1TB 712GB free Firmware: SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 113 116 113 113 117 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 88.2 Write 94.8 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 114 20% 89.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.6 5% 2 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB 163 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	83.6% Excellent	MC Read 30.5 MC Write 32.4 MC Mixed 26.2 85% 29.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 31.8 SC Mixed 25.4 71% 24.9 GB/s	Latency 62.3 64% 62.3 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83.6% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 50%

Yacht

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	4x
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	2x

SSD
MZNLN256HMHQ-00000 256GBSamsungBench 96%, 10,917 samples	3x
Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GBCorsairBench 162%, 26,501 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 75%, 163 samples	5x
KF2666C15S4/8G KHX2400C15S4/8G KF2666C15S4/8G KHX2400C15S4/8G 32GBKingstonBench 79%, 1 sample	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16