bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory9.75GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9.75GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardParallels Parallels Virtual Platform
Memory8 GB free of 9.75 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1909 x 1009 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170815
Uptime94.8 Days
Run DateAug 25 '18 at 17:04
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon 5150
CPU Socket #0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Memory 53.3
1-Core 23.5
2-Core 32.4
27% 36.4 Pts
4-Core 39.3
8-Core 39.9
5% 39.6 Pts
64-Core 27.4
2% 27.4 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Parallels Display Adapter (WDDM)
ParallelsVM(1AB8 0400) 1GB
Driver: prl_umdd.dll Ver. 13.0.42936.0
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.2
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 11.7
16% 15.4 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 20.1
13% 14.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Windows 10-0 SSD 137GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: F.C9EZER
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 81 76 104 84 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 573
Write 304
Mixed 386
SusWrite 85.1
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 15.8
4K Mixed 16.1
51% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 66
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 60.9
47% 64.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
8192, 1024, 512, 256 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.64% Terrible
MC Read 2.6
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 2.2
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0.2
2% 0.63 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 7.64%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,494 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback