Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3320M-$199 30,496 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	59.8% Above average	Memory 82.8 1-Core 90.4 2-Core 153 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 216 29% 215 Pts	64-Core 215 13% 215 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.8% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 21F3) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4885 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.95% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 5.81 Parallax 3 4% 4.4 fps	MRender 5.24 Gravity 2.43 Splatting 8.35 5% 5.34 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.95% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GB-$180 4,505 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 171GB free (System drive) Firmware: LADi SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 153 150 147 148 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 367 Write 129 Mixed 191 SusWrite 146 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 22 4K Write 13.5 4K Mixed 16.1 61% 17.2 MB/s	DQ Read 160 DQ Write 66 DQ Mixed 66.9 62% 97.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8C-PB 2x4GB 1,067 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 20.5 MC Mixed 17.7 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	14x

SSD
520 Series 240GBIntel $139Bench 78%, 12,595 samples	7x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
SSD Pro 1500 Series 240GBIntel $180Bench 71%, 4,505 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	6x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	1x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	1x

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $338

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16