Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron M processor 1.60GHz 65 User benchmarks, average bench 21% U2E1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	27.5% Poor	Memory 53.1 1-Core 9.3 2-Core 13.8 21% 25.4 Pts	4-Core 14.1 8-Core 14.9 2% 14.5 Pts	64-Core 14.2 1% 14.2 Pts
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 30%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon Xpress Sanyo(144D C503) 128MB Driver: atiumdag.dll Ver. 8.561.0.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0.19 0% 0.15 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung MP0603H 49GB 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: YR200-04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 11 25 24 26 26 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.73% Terrible	Read 8.5 Write 8.3 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 21.6 9% 11.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 89% 0.6 MB/s

StoreJet Transcend 120GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 91GB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 9.6 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.5% Very poor	Read 20.5 Write 16.1 Mixed 19.2 SusWrite 15.7 24% 17.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 3.4 164% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.5% Great: 158%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM DRAM Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	6.33% Terrible	MC Read 2 MC Write 1.8 MC Mixed 1.3 5% 1.7 GB/s	SC Read 1 SC Write 1.2 SC Mixed 0.9 3% 1.03 GB/s	Latency 149 27% 149 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.33% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16