Asus PRIME X299-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics100% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME X299-A  (all builds)
Memory64 GB free of 80 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateJul 29 '18 at 21:54
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$413
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 78.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 218
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 504
8-Core 985
88% 744 Pts
64-Core 1,662
103% 1,662 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
PNY(196E 119E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
100% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 145
Parallax 135
104% 136 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 126
Splatting 106
94% 115 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 100%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_CT2050MX300SSD1 2TB
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 460 457 456 252 270 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 410
Write 445
Mixed 364
SusWrite 389
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 38.6
148% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 359
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 292
230% 320 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 100%
Great: 99%
Samsung 850 EVO 1TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 122 120 123 123 122 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 114
Write 107
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 122
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
16% 4.17 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 26%
Toshiba HDWE160 8TB
425GB free
Firmware: GX0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 131 131 129 129 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 124
Write 114
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 129
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 0.5
210% 2.53 MB/s
Seagate ST12000DM0007-2GR116 12TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: DN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 217 213 218 215 217 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 42% Great: 93%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78
932GB free
Firmware: FS2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 111 115 116 112 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 110
Write 108
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 114
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 109%
WD WD50EFRX-68MYMN1 8TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: GX0B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 153 153 152 154 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 146
Write 145
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 152
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.9
227% 2.13 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD BLS16G4D240FSB.16FAD Corsair CMU32GX4M4A2666C16 Corsair CMU32GX4M4A2666C16 KLEVV 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K KLEVV 8GBF1X08QFHH38-135-K Corsair CMU32GX4M4A2666C16 Corsair CMU32GX4M4A2666C16 80GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.2% Above average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 18.2
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 10.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 82.7
48% 82.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X299-A Builds (Compare 1,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X299-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $744
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback