ADD TO PC
BUILD

ECS A780GM-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	ECS A780GM-A (all builds)
Memory	5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 x 65536 Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090317
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '16 at 13:17
Run Duration	215 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 7750 2,273 User benchmarks, average bench 39% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Memory 70.3 1-Core 39.7 2-Core 78.7 41% 62.9 Pts	4-Core 78.9 8-Core 79 11% 78.9 Pts	64-Core 78.8 5% 78.8 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Asus(1043 84BB) Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Lighting 23.9 Reflection 17.7 Parallax 20.8 20% 20.8 fps	MRender 26.5 Gravity 19.4 Splatting 17.7 17% 21.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 251GB free Firmware: 01.01S02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 19 (03) Spinup time 143 142 3825 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4111 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8583 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2865 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 236 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3874 (C2) HDA temperature 109 101 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	58.6% Above average	Read 101 Write 102 Mixed 41.1 60% 81.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.36 118% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 76%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 228GB free Firmware: 01.01S02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 196 2 (03) Spinup time 149 139 3550 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3499 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8579 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2866 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 196 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3302 (C2) HDA temperature 109 100 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 199 199 151 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 199 199 150 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 151	69.3% Good	Read 120 Write 120 Mixed 28.5 65% 89.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.79 4K Write 2.85 4K Mixed 0.39 129% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 76%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB 24,608 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 246GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 188 187 3591 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 530 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1267 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 494 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 42 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 487 (C2) HDA temperature 102 95 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 3 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	45.5% Average	Read 74.2 Write 84.3 Mixed 39.1 49% 65.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.18 57% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 52%
BUFFALO HD-QSSU2/R5 1 1.5TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 508GB free, PID 00f1 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	8.3% Terrible	Read 22.3 Write 20.6 Mixed 13 23% 18.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 0.15 4K Mixed 0.08 10% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.3% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 9.5 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.4 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical A780GM-A Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS A780GM-A

CPU
Phenom X3 8450AMDBench 39%, 1,789 samples	4x
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	3x
Processor model unknownAMDBench 45%, 379 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 3200ATIBench 1%, 5,730 samples	5x
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples	4x
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	3x

SSD
2.5 240GBRX7Bench 61%, 50 samples	2x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $137Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	2x
Q-720 720GBBench 77%, 802 samples	2x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	16x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	4x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback