Alienware M15x

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlienware M15x  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100824
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateApr 14 '16 at 12:44
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 X 940-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 30
2-Core 59.1
39% 55 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 196
18% 153 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 260M
Dell(1028 02A2) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4195
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 7.23
Parallax 2.44
6% 5.59 fps
MRender 6.33
Gravity 5.53
Splatting 4.83
4% 5.56 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 120GB-$63
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.5% Below average
Read 257
Write 159
Mixed 179
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 8.2
38% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 60.3
DQ Mixed 32.8
40% 72.3 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 91%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0302
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 25.1
Mixed 27.2
21% 28 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.29
85% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 65%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 500GB-$49
462GB free
Firmware: 0004SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49% Average
Read 86.6
Write 84.2
Mixed 85
64% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.43
86% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 49%
Great: 58%
ST2000DX 001-1CM164 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Read 26.4
Write 19.7
Mixed 18.8
26% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 4.18
4K Mixed 0.47
160% 1.72 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600L CL9 Series 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
37.9% Below average
MC Read 16
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 88.5
45% 88.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M15x Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware M15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $218
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback