HP EliteBook 8440p

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8440p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 172A
Memory1.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151111
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJul 24 '18 at 05:17
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 540
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Memory 49.8
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 111
43% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 167
22% 166 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
HP(103C 172A) 2.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.3268
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 0.93
Reflection 1.08
Parallax 0.94
1% 0.98 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.61
1% 1.28 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 158 149 156 196 187 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55.9% Above average
Read 222
Write 203
Mixed 170
SusWrite 168
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 26.2
94% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 39.3
68% 133 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 124%
INTEL SS DSC2BW180A3H 180GB
167GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 24 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.2% Poor
Read 29.2
Write 23.3
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 22
33% 25 MB/s
4K Read 5.3
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 5.9
407% 5.57 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
null MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
23% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 9.3
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 7
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 161
25% 161 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8440p Builds (Compare 315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8440p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback