Gateway DX4870

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gateway DX4870 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gateway IPIMB-AR
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130430
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '18 at 22:35
Run Duration	301 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3330 51,926 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	69.8% Good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 85.1 2-Core 167 67% 113 Pts	4-Core 311 8-Core 324 42% 317 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 69.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6253) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.5% Below average	Lighting 40.9 Reflection 32 Parallax 38.2 33% 37 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 38.3 Splatting 37.1 31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$50 23,658 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 203 197 200 199 191 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	81.5% Excellent	Read 475 Write 399 Mixed 328 SusWrite 203 79% 351 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 33.9 113% 37.4 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 270 220% 315 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 81.5% Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 931GB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 174 176 96 133 162 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	87.6% Excellent	Read 156 Write 140 Mixed 77.7 SusWrite 149 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 160% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 87.6% Great: 112%
Lacie d2 Quadra v3C 3TB 190 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free Firmware: 051E SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 99 104 103 98 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 163 Write 126 Mixed 68 SusWrite 99.9 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 109%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3TB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 158 152 155 155 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Read 144 Write 158 Mixed 81.7 SusWrite 154 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 3TB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 157 152 155 154 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	93.6% Outstanding	Read 172 Write 163 Mixed 81 SusWrite 154 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.7 156% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 93.6% Great: 89%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 551GB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 121 116 124 124 120 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 130 Write 131 Mixed 68 SusWrite 119 150% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 119% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 60%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA332 1TB 114 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 931GB free, PID 1004 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 19 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 23.3 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 18.9 32% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 19%
Hitachi HDS722020ALA330 2TB 200 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2TB free, PID ce17 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 20 19 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 32 Write 23.2 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 18.9 32% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BD160B.C16F 859B CT51264BD160B.C16F Kingston ACR16D3LU1NGG/4G Kingston ACR16D3LU1NGG/4G 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58.6% Above average	MC Read 22 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 17.9 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.2 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16.5 45% 15.9 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical DX4870 Builds (Compare 297 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Gateway DX4870

CPU
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	92x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	54x
Core i5-2320Intel $165Bench 64%, 38,345 samples	24x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	71x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	42x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	24x

SSD
WDBNCE5000PNC 500GBWDCBench 94%, 17,781 samples	16x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
860 Pro 512GBSamsung $150Bench 110%, 16,934 samples	7x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG NT2GC64B88G0NF-CG 6GBNanyaBench 32%, 297 samples	13x
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 47%, 2,338 samples	12x
ACR512X64D3U16C11G 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 749 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16