Acer Predator G3-572

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive55.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Predator G3-572  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Sienta_KLS
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171226
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateJul 23 '18 at 08:51
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
48% Average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 38.8
2-Core 77.5
41% 62.1 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 153
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 150
9% 150 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 118A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 22.20.16.4815
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Lighting 6.87
Reflection 10
Parallax 6.91
6% 7.94 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 6
Splatting 14.3
8% 9.42 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS128G39TND-N210A 128GB
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 124 126 112 105 128 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 413
Write 126
Mixed 153
SusWrite 119
44% 203 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 15.6
73% 25.4 MB/s
DQ Read 325
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 120
117% 191 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 70%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
908GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 113 116 115 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 137
Write 99.5
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 115
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.8
222% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 79%
hp v265b 16GB
9GB free, PID ba07
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.8 5.7 5.6 5.7 5.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
3.09% Terrible
Read 12.2
Write 5.2
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 5.3
7% 6.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.09%
Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer 16GB
11GB free, PID 5530, hp v265b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 3.6 3.3 3.4 3.7 3.7 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
9.4% Terrible
Read 19.5
Write 10.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 3.8
12% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 2.1
139% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 11.7
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 11.1
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator G3-572 Builds (Compare 1,407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3-572

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback