Asus P8Z77-V PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	20% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V PRO (all builds)
Memory	25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130813
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jul 14 '18 at 20:47
Run Duration	229 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 107 2-Core 190 76% 129 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 508 50% 410 Pts	64-Core 508 31% 508 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% EVGA(3842 2660) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	20% Very poor	Lighting 22.2 Reflection 24.6 Parallax 30.9 18% 25.9 fps	MRender 33.5 Gravity 29.2 Splatting 25.7 24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 301GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 370 328 323 321 322 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	96% Outstanding	Read 457 Write 439 Mixed 342 SusWrite 343 89% 395 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 40 130% 43.5 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 364 273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96% Great: 134%
Intel 520 Series 240GB-$139 12,595 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 51GB free Firmware: 400i SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 134 143 152 143 142 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.1% Good	Read 267 Write 204 Mixed 227 SusWrite 147 47% 211 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 48.6 4K Mixed 29.1 104% 34.8 MB/s	DQ Read 214 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 195 145% 192 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 397GB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 118 118 119 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 119 Write 93.7 Mixed 72.3 SusWrite 118 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47 10,943 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 556GB free Firmware: GKAOAB0A SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 75 75 75 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Read 75.6 Write 78.1 Mixed 40.3 SusWrite 74.8 49% 67.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 178% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 46%
Toshiba X300 6TB-$78 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 3TB free Firmware: FS2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 177 180 180 182 184 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 175 Write 172 Mixed 67.6 SusWrite 180 108% 149 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 415% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 109%
FANTOM WD10EACS-00D6B0 1TB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 335GB free, PID 1340 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 31.3 Write 25.9 Mixed 24.5 SusWrite 26 36% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 21%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB 353 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 7788 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.5 4.1 4.7 4.7 4.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	4.25% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 3.7 Mixed 2 SusWrite 4.4 7% 6.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.25% Great: 16%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 256GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 199GB free, PID 4000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 85 84 87 87 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	49% Average	Read 89.9 Write 80.6 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 84.7 112% 83.1 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 6.4 420% 6.4 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x8GB 1,487 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	49.7% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.2 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.5 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 16.5 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 49.7% Great: 86%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V PRO Builds (Compare 2,082 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V PRO - $400

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	827x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	553x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	316x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	138x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	125x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	113x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	72x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	69x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	61x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	59x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	42x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $855

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16