Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4100 6,492 User benchmarks, average bench 33% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Memory 49.6 1-Core 48 2-Core 97.6 38% 65.1 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 195 26% 196 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1253) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4927 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.17% Terrible	Lighting 2.23 Reflection 3.08 Parallax 2.16 2% 2.49 fps	MRender 3.48 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 4.35 3% 3.35 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.17% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Dual Drive 64GB 47 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 56GB free, PID 559e Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.6 6.7 7.4 10 7.8 7.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	4.35% Terrible	Read 14.8 Write 16.3 Mixed 2.8 SusWrite 7.2 13% 10.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 1.2 48% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.35% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix 1x4GB 8,928 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 6.4 20% 7 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 162 25% 162 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4000IntelBench 24%, 14,024 samples	1x
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	1x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	2x

SSD
0 480GBCt480bx5Bench 58%, 896 samples	1x
SU 800 128GBAdataBench 68%, 245 samples	1x

RAM
1x4GBMicronBench 22%, 5,693 samples	2x