Acer AOHAPPY2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer AOHAPPY2  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer JE06_PT
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110426
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 10 '18 at 22:22
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N570
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Memory 43.9
1-Core 7.2
2-Core 13.8
18% 21.6 Pts
4-Core 23.5
8-Core 23
3% 23.2 Pts
64-Core 23.5
2% 23.5 Pts
Poor: 11%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 26%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$33
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 475
Write 5.2
Mixed 6
116% 162 MB/s
4K Read 71.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
3,040% 24.1 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4143523132385836344433533133333343 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB SODIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
9.39% Terrible
MC Read 4
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.23 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 0
3% 1.03 GB/s
Latency 185
22% 185 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.39%
Great: 9%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback