Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140402
Uptime8 Days
Run DateApr 06 '16 at 04:04
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$41
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 95.1
2-Core 174
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 277
37% 275 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4170
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
3.17% Terrible
Lighting 3.33
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.97
3% 4.09 fps
MRender 4.38
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.17
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.17%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
819GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 157
Write 142
Mixed 152
113% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.59
4K Write 1.57
4K Mixed 0.2
75% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 107%
CENTON DS Pro 1GB
1GB free, PID 0000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.38% Terrible
Read 21.1
Write 6.08
Mixed 9.24
13% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 0.14
4K Mixed 0.13
34% 2.32 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 6.38%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ASU16D3LU1KFG/8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
31% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 8.4
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.53 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $328
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback