Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1494
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111110
Uptime13 Days
Run DateApr 05 '16 at 08:38
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 88.5
2-Core 175
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 338
46% 342 Pts
64-Core 341
21% 341 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)
HP(103C 1494) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.1
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 1
1% 1.19 fps
MRender 1.86
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 2
1% 1.55 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron C400 RealSSD 128GB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0809 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 425
Write 187
Mixed 260
64% 291 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 5.02
62% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 23.9
DQ Write 54.5
DQ Mixed 5.01
14% 27.8 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 70%
Seagate Video SV35.6 Series 3TB-$79
2TB free
Firmware: CV26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 183
Mixed 175
136% 181 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.21
86% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 106%
Great: 114%
ASMT 2115 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 20.3
Mixed 6.63
21% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.21
4K Mixed 0.22
86% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 1,834 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $65
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback