Today's hottest deals

Positivo S14BW01

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPositivo S14BW01  (all builds)
MotherboardPositivo S14BW01
Memory0.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160818
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 05 '18 at 00:58
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3010
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.05 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Memory 27.2
1-Core 19.7
2-Core 25.8
16% 24.2 Pts
4-Core 27.4
8-Core 33.5
4% 30.5 Pts
64-Core 34.5
2% 34.5 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Device(1297 2053) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.29% Terrible
Lighting 1.43
Reflection 1.81
Parallax 2.34
1% 1.86 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 1.67
Splatting 2.13
2% 1.82 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.29%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 39 38 34 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 55.5
Write 39.2
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 37.5
28% 38.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.3
55% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-045.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 1.9
7% 2.33 GB/s
Latency 272
15% 272 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S14BW01 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Positivo S14BW01

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 34% - Below average Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback