Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20HJS01001

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20HJS01001  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HJS01001
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171020
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 03 '18 at 15:48
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 80.8
1-Core 45.7
2-Core 106
49% 77.3 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 582
35% 348 Pts
64-Core 583
36% 583 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics P630
Legend(17AA 224D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 2.6
Reflection 10
Parallax 2.53
2% 5.06 fps
MRender 9.48
Gravity 3.17
Splatting 5.39
5% 6.01 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6L6QCXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 855 1067 998 996 862 892 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,303
Write 1,120
Mixed 575
SusWrite 945
221% 986 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 41.5
127% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 868
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 573
425% 578 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 175%
Great: 306%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: 6L6QCXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 870 163 0 424 861 905 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Read 2,339
Write 1,367
Mixed 792
SusWrite 537
278% 1,259 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 69.8
239% 85.7 MB/s
DQ Read 584
DQ Write 386
DQ Mixed 418
330% 463 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 222%
Great: 306%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS7AFR8N-UH 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59% Above average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 16.9
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 28.7
SC Mixed 24.3
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback