Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H67A-UD3H-B3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H67A-UD3H-B3  (all builds)
Memory6.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120327
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJul 02 '18 at 12:38
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$79
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
54% Above average
Memory 82.5
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 114
56% 88.1 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 165
20% 156 Pts
64-Core 188
12% 188 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 2968) 2GB
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.3% Below average
Lighting 40.5
Reflection 36.5
Parallax 32.9
33% 36.7 fps
MRender 33.4
Gravity 35.2
Splatting 33.4
28% 34 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$95
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 600ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 110 124 131 125 138 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 251
Write 198
Mixed 221
SusWrite 125
44% 199 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 23.5
83% 30 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 153
109% 138 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 85%
PNY SSD2SC120G1CS1754D117-551 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: CS111101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 209
Write 192
Mixed 173
43% 191 MB/s
4K Read 11.8
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 15.3
52% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 164
DQ Write 58
DQ Mixed 84.1
69% 102 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 90%
Asmedia ASM1053E 1TB
775GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 80 81 85 85 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Read 196
Write 148
Mixed 40
SusWrite 80.6
84% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 101%
WD Elements 1TB
248GB free, PID 10a8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 45 46 46 46 47 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 90.5
Write 90.7
Mixed 50.2
SusWrite 45.4
90% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 43%
ST310005 28AS 1TB
402GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 30 30 31 31 31 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 30.3
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 30.1
39% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 44%
WDC WD10 EALS-00Z8A0 1TB
892GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 25.5
Mixed 26.2
SusWrite 26.5
36% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
99% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16%
Great: 55%
WD My Passport 07A8 1TB
822GB free, PID 07a8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 44 44 46 44 48 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 84
Write 82.5
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 44
76% 59.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
22.8% Poor
MC Read 7.4
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.27 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.7
15% 5.3 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H67A-UD3H-B3 Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H67A-UD3H-B3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback