Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	13.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon Platinum 8168 138 User benchmarks, average bench 60% None, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38.6% Below average	Memory 51.8 1-Core 108 2-Core 150 59% 103 Pts	4-Core 148 8-Core 150 20% 149 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.6% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 86GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 56GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 18 12 17 15 13 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	13.6% Very poor	Read 33.8 Write 21.4 Mixed 30.1 SusWrite 15.1 6% 25.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 14.3 33% 11.6 MB/s	DQ Read 4.5 DQ Write 11.1 DQ Mixed 17.1 10% 10.9 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 75%
Virtual HD 17GB 390 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 16GB free Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 22 16 18 20 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 33.8 Write 34.4 Mixed 34.1 SusWrite 18.3 7% 30.1 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 16.8 4K Mixed 16.7 54% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 17.1 DQ Write 17.1 DQ Mixed 17.2 13% 17.1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 31%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 32GB 40 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 23GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 25 16 24 22 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.2% Very poor	Read 24.7 Write 32.8 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 21 17% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.8 129% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.2% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% null MHz 512, 3584 MB Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	32.7% Below average	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 22.5 MC Mixed 6.3 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 23.7 SC Mixed 7.2 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 154 26% 154 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,060x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	829x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325