Today's hottest deals

Xen HVM domU

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemXen HVM domU  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory2.5 GB free of 3.99609 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, , , ,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180612
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '18 at 19:00
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5450
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.1% Below average
Memory 56.4
1-Core 36.7
2-Core 56.7
34% 49.9 Pts
4-Core 77.2
8-Core 107
12% 92.1 Pts
64-Core 121
8% 121 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 35%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Sapphire(174B E164) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.36% Terrible
Lighting 1.83
Reflection 1.96
Parallax 1.72
2% 1.84 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 1.57
Splatting 1.78
1% 1.28 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.36%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Xensrc PVDISK 47GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 34 12 8.6 9.2 3 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.5% Very poor
Read 29.1
Write 53.2
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 17.8
22% 29.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.6 MB/s
Xensrc PVDISK 43GB
20GB free
Firmware: 2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 19 17 18 22 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 56.9
Write 15.5
Mixed 28
SusWrite 21.6
23% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.3
82% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x3GB
1 of 1 slots used
3GB DIMM RAM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
MC Read 3
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 4.5
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 1.7
7% 2.4 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HVM domU Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Xen HVM domU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback