| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 6.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8H67-M PRO (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20110211 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 30 '18 at 06:31 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 20% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.2%
Good
|
65% 109 Pts
|
38% 286 Pts
|
20% 323 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX
Asus(1043 8286) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
|
6.96%
Terrible
|
8% 7.02 fps
|
5% 6.76 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C8 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
26.4%
Poor
|
24% 8.3 GB/s
|
21% 7.37 GB/s
|
56% 71.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 951 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 156x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 120x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 116x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 73x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 49x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 46x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $221 |