Today's hottest deals

Acer Veriton M670G/M670

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton M670G/M670  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer EQ45M
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors, 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100505
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 29 '18 at 02:36
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$57
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 18.9
2-Core 71.7
37% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 48.4
8-Core 55.3
7% 51.8 Pts
64-Core 69.9
4% 69.9 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Q45/Q43 Express Chipset
Acer(1025 0151) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 0.58
Parallax 0.62
1% 0.63 fps
MRender 0.52
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.87
0% 0.62 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 102 117 114 116 111 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.5% Below average
Read 203
Write 122
Mixed 142
SusWrite 113
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 17.5
54% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 121
DQ Mixed 137
106% 145 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 81%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
295GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 105 104 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 100
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 104
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5673EH1-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 1066 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 5.1
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 4.6
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.77 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M670G/M670 Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M670G/M670

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $92
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback