Asus P8Z68 DELUXE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (65%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68 DELUXE  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJun 26 '18 at 13:24
Run Duration596 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 65%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
46.1% Average
Memory 68
1-Core 47.9
2-Core 111
46% 75.5 Pts
4-Core 132
8-Core 247
23% 190 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.87% Terrible
Lighting 0.97
Reflection 1.38
Parallax 1.44
1% 1.26 fps
MRender 1.48
Gravity 0.53
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.22 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.87%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Read 505
Write 407
Mixed 417
99% 443 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 30.3
113% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 29.8
37% 67 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$90
1TB free
Firmware: 0107
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 120
Write 131
Mixed 107
90% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.83
4K Mixed 0.19
74% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
505GB free
Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 125
Write 92.4
Mixed 123
86% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.45
4K Mixed 0.2
80% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
468GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 83.7
Write 12.9
Mixed 19.6
28% 38.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.05
40% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114
454GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 158
Write 101
Mixed 78.9
84% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.16
77% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
448GB free
Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 95.5
Mixed 80.7
69% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.79
4K Write 0.95
4K Mixed 0.21
73% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 90%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
117GB free
Firmware: 0107
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 104
Write 56.9
Mixed 62.5
56% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.32
4K Mixed 0.13
52% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 59%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
892GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 112
Write 98.4
Mixed 98.2
130% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.26
62% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 71%
ST3000DM 001-1CH166 3TB
420GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 145
Write 130
Mixed 89.3
150% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.24
45% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 71%
ADATA SX 900 512GB
57GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
89.6% Excellent
Read 261
Write 130
Mixed 172
219% 187 MB/s
4K Read 8.86
4K Write 6.95
4K Mixed 6.24
482% 7.35 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 120%
Generic Flash Disk 32GB
13GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
4.47% Terrible
Read 19.8
Write 7.1
Mixed 8.71
13% 11.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.11
4K Write 0.006
4K Mixed 0.006
1% 0.04 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.47%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CML8GX3M1A1600C10 8502 1333EL Series 8502 PSD34G13332 16GB
1067, 1067, 1067 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.3% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 7.9
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68 DELUXE Builds (Compare 419 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68 DELUXE - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $785
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback