Dell XPS 8500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.21% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 8500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0NW73C
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2048 x 1152 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121019
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 24 '18 at 19:16
Run Duration387 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 179
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 344
46% 344 Pts
64-Core 343
21% 343 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Nvidia(10DE 0977) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 311.6
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.21% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 3.04
Parallax 2
2% 2.56 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 2.57
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.21%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_ Crucial_CT500MX2 500GB
394GB free
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
3.4% Terrible
Read 32.5
Write 20.5
Mixed 25
6% 26 MB/s
4K Read 1.09
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.54
3% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 3.4%
Great: 105%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
327GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 375
Write 306
Mixed 213
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 27.5
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 22.5
86% 26.6 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 72.5
DQ Mixed 41.9
49% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 134%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 151
Write 111
Mixed 118
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.16
4K Mixed 0.21
64% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 4TB-$230
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 82.9
Write 118
Mixed 63
65% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 3.53
4K Mixed 0.24
108% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 94%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 4TB
2TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 25.6
Mixed 27.6
36% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.64
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.25
74% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16%
Great: 73%
WD My Passport 1.5TB
758GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 31.4
Write 25.3
Mixed 25.8
34% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.17
65% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 44%
WDC WD20 EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
395GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.8% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 24.2
Mixed 6.72
24% 21 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.17
60% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 44%
WDC WD64 01AALS-00E3A0 640GB
208GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.3% Very poor
Read 32.4
Write 25.4
Mixed 16.7
30% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.93
4K Mixed 0.37
81% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.M8F Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 859B CT51264BA160BJ.M8F Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18.6
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8500 Builds (Compare 2,124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback