Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock H61M-DGS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateJun 22 '18 at 10:24
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330S
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 164
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 310
39% 299 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
ASRock(1849 0152) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.61% Terrible
Lighting 1.7
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 3.35
2% 2.38 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.61%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC54 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 149
Write 117
Mixed 134
100% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 1.69
4K Mixed 0.17
78% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 19.01H19 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 119
Write 85.3
Mixed 115
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.56
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.23
82% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.7% Poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.1
19% 6.53 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.47 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-DGS R2.0 Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback