Asrock X58 SuperComputer

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	46.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X58 SuperComputer (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20101115
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 27 '16 at 14:26
Run Duration	206 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	61.4% Good	Memory 81.5 1-Core 67 2-Core 134 58% 94.1 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 304 34% 267 Pts	64-Core 322 20% 322 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 3606) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Lighting 46.2 Reflection 41.5 Parallax 56.8 38% 48.1 fps	MRender 57.1 Gravity 40.3 Splatting 39 36% 45.4 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M500 240GB-$79 31,779 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 4 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 7760 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2038 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 89 89 334 (AE) Unknown 100 100 1098 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4066 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 62 46 231928234022 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 89 89 11 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 91252475409 (F7) Unknown 100 100 192301 (F8) Unknown 100 100 2437179976	46.4% Average	Read 202 Write 227 Mixed 166 44% 199 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 48.3 4K Mixed 15.5 76% 28 MB/s	DQ Read 24.1 DQ Write 58 DQ Mixed 13.7 18% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 91%
Samsung HD102UJ 1TB 534 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 305GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 75 75 8260 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 7652 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7392 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 1 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1962 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 15 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 52 605356068 (C2) HDA temperature 63 49 638910501 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 869882 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0	58.6% Above average	Read 102 Write 102 Mixed 97.7 76% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 2.29 4K Mixed 0.41 108% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 65%
JMicron Generic 320GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 280GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 29.2 Mixed 30.2 39% 30.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.3 48% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 36%
ST325082 3A 250GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 181GB free, PID 2bcf Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 27.5 Mixed 27.8 36% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.34 41% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 6 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	MC Read 6.6 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 5.5 17% 6 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 6.5 18% 6.47 GB/s	Latency 77.8 51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58 SuperComputer Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock X58 SuperComputer

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	3x
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples	1x

GPU
R9 290AMD $399Bench 46%, 68,699 samples	1x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	1x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
MX300 525GBCrucial $150Bench 86%, 105,037 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	2x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	1x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $639

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16