MSI MS-17C6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GP73 Leopard 8RD
MotherboardMSI MS-17C6  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 15 '18 at 22:29
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 225
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 568
59% 475 Pts
64-Core 776
48% 776 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 121A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4939
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.47% Terrible
Lighting 7.47
Reflection 31.3
Parallax 6.94
6% 15.2 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.74
7% 8.74 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.47%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba KSG60ZMV256G 256GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ABXA4102 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 498
Write 320
Mixed 391
89% 403 MB/s
4K Read 22.6
4K Write 62.6
4K Mixed 16
88% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 4.78
45% 106 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 95%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
1TB free
Firmware: SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 107
Write 80.1
Mixed 65.5
63% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.04
4K Write 0.94
4K Mixed 0.3
94% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 68%
ST332083 3A 320GB
298GB free, PID 0073
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.1% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 35.1
Mixed 34.6
45% 34.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.05
4K Mixed 0.39
51% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.2% Very good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 20.1
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 21
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17C6 Builds (Compare 641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17C6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback