Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive99% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140822
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateJun 10 '18 at 23:00
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 96
2-Core 173
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 324
8-Core 624
56% 474 Pts
64-Core 804
50% 804 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
Nvidia(10DE 1116) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 397.64
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.9% Above average
Lighting 70.1
Reflection 84.5
Parallax 76.3
57% 77 fps
MRender 78.2
Gravity 75
Splatting 66.7
59% 73.3 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial_CT1050MX 1TB
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R040 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 486
Mixed 494
110% 490 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 33.7
120% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 74.3
113% 215 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
385GB free
Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 185
Write 127
Mixed 58.5
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.74
4K Mixed 0.23
85% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD48G21332 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
62.2% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 20.5
64% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15.8
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 820 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $768
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback