HP h9-1100ex

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP h9-1100ex (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON 2AB5
Memory	6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120105
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '18 at 21:05
Run Duration	419 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	68%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$186 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 83.7 2-Core 125 61% 97.2 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 468 40% 345 Pts	64-Core 468 29% 468 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% HP(103C 6616) 3GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1045.0 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27% Poor	Lighting 34.2 Reflection 25.7 Parallax 45.6 28% 35.2 fps	MRender 24.7 Gravity 34.9 Splatting 32.1 25% 30.6 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$85 6,631 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 751GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 175 5825 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5640 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5807 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1165 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 79 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 5561 (C2) HDA temperature 115 102 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	71.5% Very good	Read 122 Write 127 Mixed 113 91% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.33 4K Mixed 0.2 98% 1.11 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 356GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 82 63 190244495 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 376 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 75 60 8660294858 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1863 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 361 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 99 2 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 59 656605219 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 402 (C2) HDA temperature 35 17 73014444067 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 1 1 190244495 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 124502511978305 (F1) Unknown 100 253 10990642688 (F2) Unknown 100 253 10162259083	96.2% Outstanding	Read 166 Write 169 Mixed 155 123% 164 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.28 81% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 88%
ST310005 24AS 1TB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 931GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 26.1 Mixed 28.9 37% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.66 4K Mixed 0.41 73% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 19%
TOSHIBA MK1059GSM 1TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 69GB free, PID 0579 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 23 Mixed 7.26 23% 20.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 0.29 4K Mixed 0.16 17% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 20%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB-$9 17,023 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 29GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 95.6 Write 25.1 Mixed 35.3 53% 52 MB/s	4K Read 7.35 4K Write 0.43 4K Mixed 0.02 43% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 39%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB 30,139 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	9% Terrible	Read 12.9 Write 6.05 Mixed 7.95 10% 8.97 MB/s	4K Read 3.09 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 1.05 103% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB M378B5773CH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	47.4% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 15.3 47% 16.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 13.2 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP h9-1100ex

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)