Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 10 '18 at 16:58
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 85.2
1-Core 98.7
2-Core 200
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 385
52% 385 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
62% Good
Lighting 78.2
Reflection 77.6
Parallax 75.8
64% 77.2 fps
MRender 71.1
Gravity 70.4
Splatting 72.7
59% 71.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 412
Mixed 422
100% 448 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 41.3
150% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 125
146% 254 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40
75GB free
Firmware: 1H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 95.5
Write 85.3
Mixed 86.1
67% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.42
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.43
98% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 65%
Seagate Portable 1TB
294GB free, PID 3332
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Read 39.4
Write 33.4
Mixed 35.7
46% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.08
4K Mixed 0.39
52% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1600 CL10 Series Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 8502 1600 CL10 Series Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.6% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 17.9
49% 17 GB/s
Latency 71.8
56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,055 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback