Acer Aspire 5742G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire 5742G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire 5742G
Memory2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20110401
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateJun 08 '18 at 21:26
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 380-$130
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Memory 50.5
1-Core 20.7
2-Core 38.8
26% 36.7 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 158
17% 136 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 0487) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.741.0.0
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.81
0% 0.8 fps
MRender 0.81
Gravity 0.57
Splatting 0.87
1% 0.75 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$26
328GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 55.7
Write 50.3
Mixed 46.4
38% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 0.91
4K Mixed 0.26
61% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CF8 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.73 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 5.8
13% 4.7 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire 5742G Builds (Compare 546 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire 5742G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback